As early as the 1980s, he referred to the importance of close German-Austrian-Hungarian cooperation.

As early as the 1980s, he referred to the importance of close German-Austrian-Hungarian cooperation.

As early as the 1980s, he pointed out the importance of close German-Austrian-Hungarian cooperation. “The opening of the Hungarian borders only went so smoothly with the help of the Austrian government,” he reported.

© ALEX HALADA / AFP Vladimir Putin with Federal Chancellor Sebastian Kurz

Teltschik was sympathetic to the controversial approach taken by the Visegrad states: “” As early as the mid-80s, the representatives of these states kept telling me that they would become part of the EC as soon as possible (European Community, forerunner of the EU, note). wanted to be “” he said. The problem is that national consciousness was an instrument of emancipation from Soviet rule and that the states, after regaining their sovereignty after joining the EU, noticed that they “had to give up sovereignty rights”. “” They still struggle with that today, that’s the dilemma they face, “” he said.

For this reason, the political scientist spoke out in favor of a Europe of different speeds: Then there would be “” a circle that wants to go ahead “” and a circle that feels “” too much “” and “” does not want to “” want to participate . German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron would have the opportunity to implement this. “” If the two finally agree on a program, the Italians will be among the first to take part, along with the Spanish and the Benelux countries, “” he speculated. The rest would then gradually join.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

Sign in Connect to Facebook

Cigarette consumption and its consequences cost Austria billions.

Smoking damages Austria by around 2.4 billion euros or 0.68 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) every year. If the tobacco tax revenue of around 1.8 billion euros is deducted, around 665 million euros in net costs remain per year (data base 2016). This is shown by calculations by experts from the Institute for Higher Studies (IHS) around Thomas Czypionka before the “” Don’t smoke “” referendum.

“Smoking is responsible for 16 percent of deaths in Austria”

“” Smoking is responsible for 16 percent of deaths in Austria, including 230 deaths annually from passive smoking. Smoking causes considerable costs for society: around 2.41 billion euros or 0.7 percent of GDP.https://123helpme.me/ Even when offset against savings in old-age pensions (because smokers and passive smokers die earlier; note) as well as tobacco tax revenues, annual net costs of around EUR 665 million or 0.2 percent of GDP “”, state the health economists in their study presented on Friday.

© APA / Martin Hirsch

In a previous study in 2008, the IHS estimated the total costs for smoking in Austria for 2003 at 1.64 billion euros. Since then, the calculation methods have gotten better.

Life expectancy reduced by years

According to this, an estimated 12,840 people die each year in Austria directly or indirectly from tobacco consumption (8,010 men, 4,830 women). Of these, around 230 deaths are due to passive smoking, including the death of eleven children within the first year of life, as the health economists found. Men who smoke have an average life expectancy reduced by 7.5 years, women have a life expectancy reduced by 6.3 years. In the case of passive smokers – their protection is the main concern of the “” Don’t smoke “” referendum that started on October 1st – life expectancy is still reduced by 0.6 years.

The turquoise-blue federal government, which has overturned the gastro-smoking ban that was previously co-opted by the ÖVP, expects savings of one billion euros in the coming years from the planned amalgamation of health insurances into five social insurance carriers, which is doubted by critics. However, according to the IHS, smoking in Austria alone cost 630.5 million euros in direct medical costs in 2016. Direct non-medical costs (e.g. sick pay, care expenses, disability pension, etc.) accounted for 197.5 million euros. The indirect expenses (sick leave, reduced employment, premature mortality, etc.) ultimately amounted to 1.492 billion euros.

Enormous economic losses

This means that the economic losses incurred through tobacco consumption in Austria reach EUR 2.411 billion. In contrast, tobacco tax revenues in 2016 amounted to almost 1.835 billion euros. The net costs are therefore around EUR 665 million.

The IHS health economists also performed a model calculation with a comparison to Finland. In 2014, 14.4 percent of men and 10.9 percent of women smoked in the Scandinavian country, while 26.5 percent of Austrian men and 22.1 percent of Austrians smoked. In Finland, 2.3 percent of men were passive smokers that year, as well as 1.5 percent of women (Austria: 9.8 percent of men and 7.1 percent of women).

Savings potential of one billion euros

An adjustment of the smoking level in Austria to that of Finland would bring about the same savings potential that the Austrian federal government expects from its social security structural reforms. “” By lowering the prevalence rates (proportion of smokers / passive smokers; note) at the level of Finland, 1.05 billion euros (…) could be saved annually (…). “”

In the declaration of support for the referendum, 591,146 signatures for a smoking ban in restaurants were already collected. The referendum was initiated by Cancer Aid and the Medical Association.

Net cost probably even higher

At the Institute for Higher Studies (IHS), in connection with the assessment of the economic damage caused by smoking for the Austrian economy, it was finally pointed out that the net costs are probably still higher than 665 million euros. The latter figure results from a counter-calculation of 2.4 billion euros in damage with 1.8 billion euros in tobacco tax revenues.

But the net costs are likely to be around one billion euros. Taking into account a life cycle calculation for the tobacco tax, the IHS experts came to around 1.3 billion euros in tobacco tax income (annuity). Tobacco tax receipts change from year to year and only recently reached 1.8 billion euros. If you only subtract this 1.3 billion euros from the 2.4 billion euros in total damage, the net cost of smoking would be higher.

For months, News has been campaigning for the absolute ban on smoking in restaurants with a focus on topics. In a joint declaration, all the editors-in-chief of the News publishing group are now calling on the federal government to enforce this smoking ban. Read the explanation here.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

Login Connect with Facebook Denksport Thu., Oct 25th, 2018 10:32 pm report

Yes, 100% of humanity die directly or indirectly through the presence or absence of food, because everyone has come into contact with food at some point. Great statistic too, right? And countless children die from abortions. And there are people who die by the death penalty, and others because of too much or too little exercise. Dear WHO, thank you for your great work.

Denksport Thu., Oct. 25, 2018 10:41 pm report

In monetary terms, one can calculate that smokers are economic factors through their consumption, create jobs through the demand for a stimulant with intoxicating effects, and treatment costs for illnesses, and even pensions help save because they die earlier. Seriously: how to turn it, it nonsensical statements collide. Why? Because smoking is a private matter!

Denksport Thu., Oct. 25, 2018 10:50 pm

In our world it is permissible to kill people in a legally legal manner, for example in war, abortions, the death penalty or organ transplants, but if someone dies through possible personal negligence or wants euthanasia, a tam tam is held is far from our prohibitionist systems.

Sign in Connect with Facebook Page 1 of 1  

Cigarette consumption and its consequences cost Austria billions.

Smoking damages Austria by around 2.4 billion euros or 0.68 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) every year. If the tobacco tax revenue of around 1.8 billion euros is deducted, around 665 million euros in net costs remain per year (data base 2016). This is shown by calculations by experts from the Institute for Higher Studies (IHS) around Thomas Czypionka before the “” Don’t smoke “” referendum.

“Smoking is responsible for 16 percent of deaths in Austria”

“” Smoking is responsible for 16 percent of deaths in Austria, including 230 deaths annually from passive smoking. Smoking causes considerable costs for society: around 2.41 billion euros or 0.7 percent of GDP. Even when offset against savings in old-age pensions (because smokers and passive smokers die earlier; note) as well as tobacco tax revenues, annual net costs of around EUR 665 million or 0.2 percent of GDP “”, state the health economists in their study presented on Friday.

© APA / Martin Hirsch

In a previous study in 2008, the IHS estimated the total costs for smoking in Austria for 2003 at 1.64 billion euros. Since then, the calculation methods have gotten better.

Life expectancy reduced by years

According to this, an estimated 12,840 people die each year in Austria directly or indirectly from tobacco consumption (8,010 men, 4,830 women). Of these, around 230 deaths are due to passive smoking, including the death of eleven children within the first year of life, as the health economists found. Men who smoke have an average life expectancy reduced by 7.5 years, women have a life expectancy reduced by 6.3 years. In the case of passive smokers – their protection is the main concern of the “” Don’t smoke “” referendum that started on October 1st – life expectancy is still reduced by 0.6 years.

The turquoise-blue federal government, which has overturned the gastro-smoking ban that was previously co-opted by the ÖVP, expects savings of one billion euros in the coming years from the planned amalgamation of health insurances into five social insurance carriers, which is doubted by critics. However, according to the IHS, smoking in Austria alone cost 630.5 million euros in direct medical costs in 2016. Direct non-medical costs (e.g. sick pay, care expenses, disability pension, etc.) accounted for 197.5 million euros. The indirect expenses (sick leave, reduced employment, premature mortality, etc.) ultimately amounted to 1.492 billion euros.

Enormous economic losses

This means that the economic losses incurred through tobacco consumption in Austria reach EUR 2.411 billion. In contrast, tobacco tax revenues in 2016 amounted to almost 1.835 billion euros. The net costs are therefore around EUR 665 million.

The IHS health economists also performed a model calculation with a comparison to Finland. In 2014, 14.4 percent of men and 10.9 percent of women smoked in the Scandinavian country, while 26.5 percent of Austrian men and 22.1 percent of Austrians smoked. In Finland, 2.3 percent of men were passive smokers that year, as well as 1.5 percent of women (Austria: 9.8 percent of men and 7.1 percent of women).

Savings potential of one billion euros

An adjustment of the smoking level in Austria to that of Finland would bring about the same savings potential that the Austrian federal government expects from its social security structural reforms. “” By lowering the prevalence rates (proportion of smokers / passive smokers; note) at the level of Finland, 1.05 billion euros (…) could be saved annually (…). “”

In the declaration of support for the referendum, 591,146 signatures for a smoking ban in restaurants were already collected. The referendum was initiated by Cancer Aid and the Medical Association.

Net cost probably even higher

At the Institute for Higher Studies (IHS), in connection with the assessment of the economic damage caused by smoking for the Austrian economy, it was finally pointed out that the net costs are probably still higher than 665 million euros. The latter figure results from a counter-calculation of 2.4 billion euros in damage with 1.8 billion euros in tobacco tax revenues.

But the net costs are likely to be around one billion euros. Taking into account a life cycle calculation for the tobacco tax, the IHS experts came to around 1.3 billion euros in tobacco tax income (annuity). Tobacco tax receipts change from year to year and only recently reached 1.8 billion euros. If you only subtract this 1.3 billion euros from the 2.4 billion euros in total damage, the net cost of smoking would be higher.

For months, News has been campaigning for the absolute ban on smoking in restaurants with a focus on topics. In a joint declaration, all the editors-in-chief of the News publishing group are now calling on the federal government to enforce this smoking ban. Read the explanation here.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

Log in Connect with Facebook Brain teaser Thu., 25.